Kevin.
Actually, I need to talk about Lionel Shriver, the author, and Eva Khatchadourian, the narrator, of this novel. Which is which? Although Shriver, in one interview, brings up the possibility of the 'unreliable narrator', it felt very much as though the first part of the novel, in which the narrator Eva discusses the philosophical process she went through before deciding to get pregnant, is Shriver. That felt like the cleverest and most accurate part of the book, no doubt a reflection of thoughts Shriver herself (and many women, including me) went through when weighing up the prospect of becoming a mother. (Shriver decided against - she doesn't have any children.)
To describe a novel as 'accurate' is, of course, beside the point. Someone can always point out that it's a novel, a work of imagination. There's no one way of being a mother or experiencing motherhood, just as there's no one type of baby or child.
Still, the really aggravating thing about this book - and I was highly aggravated, at the same time as I was gripped - was the way in which it represented the mother-child relationship. It didn't represent it as a relationship. Shriver was very good at depicting the process of thinking about the future and wanting to "turn the page". But her imagination failed her after the page had turned. It made me think about other life-changing events - moving to another country (or even city); beginning an affair with someone who you unexpectedly end up having a long relationship with. At the point of turning that page, you could never envisage what the experience will really be like or all the knock-on changes it will make in your life - in you. The same goes for having a baby. You enter not only a new landscape, a new role, you enter a wholly new relationship with someone who becomes of momentous importance to you. Yet in We Need to talk About Kevin, Eva herself doesn't change, through the 16 years of motherhood she narrates. Not only does she have an alienated relationship with her son - and subsequently with her husband - she apparently makes no new friends and maintains no old friendships along the way. There's at the one time a very serious - and clever, it's such a clever book - attempt to be realistic and at the same time, there are so many big gaps in this story.
There were parts where I wanted to take Eva by the shoulders and shake her, really hard (especially the part where she tries to teach Kevin to read, in a parody of the ambitious, competitive mother-housewife.) I thought the baby Kevin was unbelievable, a cunning monster from the start. But my bias is that no babies are born "evil". Eva tells us she was diagnosed with postnatal depression - yet apparently no treatment was suggested.
Later, the book comes close to horror-schlock. I got angry at Shriver - I think the description of the killings is gratuitously sensationalistic and strangely unfeeling. I had the very odd experience of almost being repulsed by the book, not wanting to go near it yet feeling compelled to finish it. When I was reading through the teenage years, I had the "out of body" experience of feeling alienated from my own son - the novel and the mother-son relationship at that point seemed to be all about manipulation and control. I was seized with the fear that that's all there was to being a mother - which was a horrible feeling to have, for an hour or so.
I suppose I have to hand it to Shriver, to have created such a powerful story.
Recent Comments