« news index | Main | a war is a war is a war »

Wednesday, August 24, 2005

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's transformed the way I think about dogs, even though I've had dogs for a large part of my life and read a number of books about the human-dog bond. I think Fennell understands the fundamentals in a way that many other behaviourists don't.

Have you read many books about the human-dog bond, susoz? Cos I'd dearly love to pick your brains on this subject. I have a half-finished essay about companion animals in literature which I want to go back to, but I need more material. Sounds like the Jan Fennell book would be an excellent place to start. Anything else you'd suggest? And, is it possible, do you think, for a non-dog owner like me to grasp dog writing?

Hi Laura, I'll have a search at home for books and let you know. The two that come to mind at the moment are Jeffrey Masson's "Dogs Never Lie About Love" and Marjorie Garber's "Dog Love". I've seen Masson in conversation (and read his book about psychoanalysis) and he is definitely an oddbod, but has some interesting things to say nonetheless. Garber is an American literaray academic who has written major books on bisexuality and cross-dressing. The human-dog bond is quite a prolific area of book-writing!

I was aware of Marjorie Garber's book, but they don't have it in our library. I'll get them to borrow me a copy. The Masson book sounds good as well. The odder, the better.

I started on this because of deeply loving two english novels: Virginia Woolf's _Flush_, and J.R. Ackerley's _My Dog Tulip_. It's not enough to just do the gushy fangirl thing in academia, I have to impersonalise if I want to publish. But I wonder if I might already be too impersonal because I don't have any first-hand experience with dogs.

(Though that might change soon - my partner's parents want to leave their jack russell with us while they go overseas...)

The comments to this entry are closed.